State v. Langley, 2016 MT 67 (March 22, 2016) (Baker, J.) (5-0, rev’d)
Issue: Whether the district court erred in denying Langley’s motion to withdraw his no contest plea.
Short Answer: Yes.
Reversed and remanded
Facts: In February 2014 the state charged Langley with one count of arson, a felony. Langley entered a plea agreement with the state under which he agreed to plead nolo contendre and the state agreed to recommend that sentencing be deferred for six years. The agreement further provided that Langley would be allowed to withdraw his plea if the state failed to perform its obligations under the plea agreement.
At the sentencing hearing, the court indicated it was not inclined to impose a deferred sentence.…